Notice: Undefined index: plik in /home/staff/iinf/parys/public_html/index.php on line 17 Notice: Undefined index: lang in /home/staff/iinf/parys/public_html/index.php on line 47 Notice: Undefined index: file in /home/staff/iinf/parys/public_html/index.php on line 66 Notice: Undefined index: picture in /home/staff/iinf/parys/public_html/index.php on line 195
A na dole są zdjęcia!!!
Since 5.07.2006 to 21.08.2006 we (4 persons from Poland) were riding on bicycles carrying whole luggage with us, sleeping in tents. Our trip had two parts: first - through Norway from Olso to Russian border, and second - from Sankt Peterburg through Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania. Here I've written some possibly useful informations, rather that full description of the trip.
We've started at Gardermoen airport and headed west along the railway line Oslo - Bergen (skipping the Oslo itself). Western Norway was, in my opinion, a most interesting part of the trip (or at least different than the northern part): beautiful high mountains and fiords with steep, rocky slopes, many waterfalls and lakes. If you are going to Norway don't make the mistake to miss the western part.
First few days were rather flat (along river). Then we had some ascents, which I can recommend. We've taken the bicycle road from Haugastol to Flam along the railway (through Finse and Myrdal). It was gravelled track (but with surface good enough for bicycles), on some short fragments covered by snow (even in July). Most of the altitude we get already on the route 7, Haugastol is on 1000 m, so the bicycle road goes generally through rather flat valley, among high mountains and a lot of lakes. The last fragment goes down very steep.
Then we were riding a small road (alternative for a long 25 km tunnel) from Aurland to Lerdal, also very nice, again climbing on about 1300 m. As on all roads between fiords here, there was steep ascent, almost flat rocky top with many lakes and poor flora, and then steep descent. Excellent views from the first part in the direction of Aurlandsfjorden.
Next we've ride along Lustafjorden and through highest pass in Norway (1434 m) to Lom. Road goes near highest mountains in Norway and one can see glaciers, etc. From Lom to Geiranger (where many says that is most beautiful fiord - in fact it looks good, but many other too), again by over 1000 m. On the top there is also a junction to a view point Dalsnibba on 1500 m (which we skipped), from where one can see the Geirangerfjord.
Other, probably also good, possibility is to go from Sogndal along Sognefjorden do Dragsvig, then north to Stryn and back to Geiranger.
From Geiranger one another ascent, and after Norddalsfjorden the famous troll road. The ascent unexpectable long and not too steep. Most famous is the second part, the descent to Andalsnes, which is concentrated in one valley with a lot of serpentines, and can be very good seen from the top.
In Andalsnes the end of high mountains for us, from here we never were on 500 m. We went near Molde and then by E39 to Trondheim (in fact small road with almost no cars, despite threatening number). Trondheim is rather not too much interesting city (but maybe most interesting of all in Norway).
After that, through the Fosen peninsula (quiet routes 715 and 720). From Namsos we've chosen route 769 (along the coast), then popular tourist route 17 up to Bodo. A lot of ferries here. Road goes not too much over the sea level, but there are also some unexpected ascents. For example near Handnesoya island on the map the road is very near to the shore - in fact it goes along the fiord, but on more than 300 m above it. A lot of pleasant views in this region. On the ferry Kilboghamn - Jektvik we cross the subpolar circle. In Bodo we were in quite interesting aircraft museum (big, a lot of real-size exhibits).
From Bodo long ferry to Lofoten islands (Moskenes) and by main road along the whole archipelago. The islands are most famous for the fisher villages, traditional houses on piles, etc. Of course they are there, but only some of the villages are interesting, and not as much as we expected. The nature here is also specific, but not as wild as in other regions.
We decided not to go by the main road near Narvik, but to north through Vesteralen to Andenes. The Vesteralen are different that Lofoten - the mountains are less steep and rather grassy and there are less villages (which are rather normal). Before Andenes we've taken very nice smaller road along the west coast.
From Andenes to Senja another long ferry, which swings a lot (waves on the sea reach above 1 m). At the beginning of Senja small pass with beautiful views. Then rather monotonous road to north (the places are also "nice" but very similar one to each other, the road still goes along the water). The fragment about 200 km before Alta becomes a little different, with some small ascents and view points. Also there was interesting phenomenon - the clouds were on very low level, so near the sea the weather was looking quite bad, but when the road went up (even 100 m), we were over the clouds and the sun was shining (additionally the clouds were arranging in non-trivial way).
In this region there are popular small Samisk villages, with Indian-like wigwams. The Sami sell souvenirs and reindeer leathers and horns. Of course we've also seen a lot of reindeers. There are quite big herds of them. Most of them are bred by people. They are not too much afraid of people and cars, so it is possible to see them near the road or on road (but they don't allow to come closer than about 10 m).
After Alta the landscape drastically changed. The road went up to about 200 m, where there was flat grassy plateau without any trees and bushes. After the junction, where we came out of E6 in the direction of Nordkapp, the road goes along the sea, but the surrounding is similar, also no trees. Additionally here (as never before) the rocks are layered (kind: slates) and stick out diagonally, it looks unstable (and sometimes like after a cataclysm).
Before Mageroya (the island with Nordkapp) long and deep underwater tunnel. The Nordkapp itself is on over 300 m high cliff (unexpectable high). Moreover, on the road from Honningsvag we've done probably about 700m of ascent, it still goes up and down. Nordkapp itself is not too much interesting, it's rather symbolical point.
From Honningsvag we've taken a ship to Kjollefjord, shortening the way by about 150 km and skipping the already seen road south (E69). It was a luxury Hurtigruten excursion ship, rather expensive (213 NOK). From here to Tana bru the road looks generally like that: steep ascent above the fiord, then flat grassy terrain and then descent to see level and again. Here are not too much villages / people, we have some problems with buying food (Tomek had to go hitchhike to buy bread).
Then to Kirkenes and into Russia, to Nikel (some details about crossing border below). Nikel is typical communistic town - only blocks of flats and desolated smoking factory. From here we travel by train to Murmansk (one train per day, very slow). In Murmansk also a lot of blocks, additionally a port and big monument of soldier on a hill over the city. From here train to Sankt Peterburg, 27 hours (but it is >1400 km, so it's appropriate time).
In Sankt Peterburg a lot of beautiful old buildings, some churches (orthodox), the river Newa and channels. Many nice places, but there is not something like concentrated old town where everything would look good. Near Peterburg there is a palace in Peterhof, surrounded with wonderful park with fountains.
From here we get lost a little, maybe not lost, but we've missed a junction several times. There are not too much direction signs in this region (on the smaller roads).
This second part of the trip was almost totally flat. The landscape was rather boring, still forests and fields.
From here to Tallinn, along the Baltic Sea (we've even seen the sea few times). Tallinn has excellent old town, not too big, but with almost only old (or old-like) buildings, surrounded with town walls, with some churches (here are also protestant ones, not only orthodox), etc.
We've shortened the way taking a train Tallinn-Parnu. Some time later it was Riga. It also has interesting old town, but there are some modern building in it, ruining the atmosphere. Additionally many buildings were in renovation (Riga was totally destroyed during world war second), so they may look good in a future.
Now we've headed home, riding to Siauliai (60 km inside Lithuania), then by two trains to Marijampole (with night on station in Kaunas), from here 60 km to Suwalki by bike. Here we've really ended the expedition, going into a train going home.
In Norway whole nights was bright, even on the south (it was only a little darker that in day, like if it would be clouds).
We were lucky and we had exceptionally few rain, only five days and no two consecutive days of rain. We've met one bicycler that told us, that last 18 days he had rain. Also on one place where we slept a man sad that it is first sunny day from last month.
The weather changes very fast. It can be rain and half an hour later clear sky. Also sometimes (often) there is only small cloud and it rains, while most of the sky is clear and sun is shining (the rainbows happen).
In Norway there is generally small traffic on the roads. Especially on the south (maybe excluding roads Oslo-Bergen and Andalsnes-Molde), where there are many roads and drivers can choose. Roads 17, E10 (Lofoten) and E6 are more busy (but comparing to other countries' roads there are not busy at all), because they are the only roads going in given direction and they are very popular for tourists (in fact tourists generates most of the traffic). Side roads on the north are very quiet. Drivers are rather friendly to bicyclers, they are careful when overtaking, etc.
We've met only two dedicated bicycle routes. One was from Nesbyen to Geilo. It uses small forest roads and goes along the valley, but it often goes up the hillside and then down, so it's not too good. The second one is from Haugastol to Flam, along the railway. I really advise it, especially in that direction. The part from Haugastol to Myrdal (crossing of the railways) is almost flat, then there is very steep descent to Flam, along the waterfall. The views around are very beautiful.
There is a lot of tunnels in Norway (including underwater tunnels). In most of them there is allowed to ride bicycle, only in the longest ones (>5 km) it is forbidden (and dangerous because of possible CO in the air). The bicycles can not use the underwater tunnel near Molde and the tunnel between Kilvik and Glomfjord, road 17 (there is a detour along the sea using the ferry Vassdalsvik - Ornes).
On some roads, tunnels or bridges people have to pay, but for bicycles it is always free (but on most ferries they have to pay also).
Russia: On the road from border to Nikel there is almost no one. The roads near Sankt Peterburg are very busy, even the smaller ones (but they less). Smaller roads can have bad surface. Cars drive very freely, not caring about the rules or about bicycles too much. In cities the local bicyclers use pavements. It is similar in Estonia and Latvia, but maybe a little better.
In Estonia there are signed bicycle routes. Route number one goes from Russian border to Tallinn and then to Latvian border. It uses smaller roads, most of which are asphalt, but some fragments are ground. The bicycle route is at least 30% longer than the main road, but on some fragments the distance is almost the same and the route is worth to be taken. It goes generally nearer the sea than the normal one, sometimes next to the shore.
In the air plane they've taken our bicycles and bags without any problems (but we had to pay for the bicycles). We had to turn the pedals to inside, the handlebar along the bicycle and to release the air from tubes.
In the trains there was possible to take the bicycles, but it was not as easy as it could be. In Russia officially man can take the bicycle, but the wheels have to be removed, and the bicycle put on the upper rack. But we handled without removing wheels. In first train in Russia we just put the bicycles somewhere, as there were very few passengers. In the second one we put one bicycle on the rack, and the other three between the seats. After that we couldn't sit on our places, we could only lie (in that kind of carriage there are sleeping places, on two levels). We were lucky, that there were four of us, otherwise such configuration wouldn't possible, because the bicycle would disturb other passengers. In Estonia and Latvia there were carriages with sitting places and one big compartment and without special bicycle places, but we put the bicycles somewhere (so that they were not disturbing too much) and it was OK. In Poland there was special bicycle carriage.
In northern Norway (starting from Trondheim) the towns are small and rare, so there are not too many shops. So man had to be careful and plan where to buy appropriate amount of food. On the very north, the distance between shops was about 80 km several times. Especially on weekends, when some of the shops are closed on Saturday afternoon and Sunday. So be careful. Additionally, in bigger cities, in hipermarkets, the prices can be up to 5 times lower (in case of bread) than in small shops in villages, so it's good to buy there as much as possible.
In Norway there was difficult to get their money. There are no special money exchange points. You can do this only in banks, which are in bigger towns only or on the airport. Banks are open only to 3 pm. There was always quite high commision of at least 50 NOK. So it is good to change a lot of money at once. It is also possible to get money from ATMs, but the rate becomes even worse.
People from Poland (and EU) need visa to Russia. Officially some invitations or vouchers are needed, but they can be bought in many tourist offices. For example we've bought our visas for 135 PLN (about 30 euro) in RUSOPOL company in Warsaw. Tourist visa is for 1 month.
We've heard that there may be some problems in Murmansk region, that there is military area everywhere and people can not get out of the city etc, so we were a little afraid if we would get into Russia at all. But we had no problems in travelling there!
The border station in Storskog is very small and with very little traffic. We've been there about half hour and we've seen only two cars (one passenger and one Statoil cistern). They've controlled our passports, we've had to fill appropriate form. After that they checked our luggage, we had to show almost everything (they had nothing to do there, so they could make exact control). The only problem was, that one of us had reindeer horn (found somewhere). The guards were thinking and disputing a lot and finally decided that it is illegal to take such thing to Russia, so we had to leave it.
The border is surrounded by high fence and from time to time there are towers with guards looking that there is everything OK. About 20 km from the border there is another barrier with guard, but he just opened the barrier without any control.
Shortly after we came to Murmansk, at the railway station the police took us to a police station. We had to give them our passports and they have written out the data to special forms. It was funny a little bit, the policemen didn't know how to fill the form, how to rewrite English letters in Russian, a lot of the policemen came to the table, everybody was looking in our passports, etc. It lasted about 15 minutes and there was no problem (we were afraid a little at first), they even almost haven't asked about anything.
We leaved Russia on busy border station in Petrozavodsk/Narva. Officially we had to have accommodation registered in passports, but no one checked it here (I've heard that sometimes they check it). Also the control of the luggage was very poor, they just told us to open one bag and looked at the top.
We had an road atlas of Norway 1:400000 by "freytag&berndt". The system of roads is there done very well, the roads shown on the map are identical with that really existing. But it is difficult to determine the size of town using that map. Big cities are of course big, but small villages with only few houses hidden somewhere in the forest are marked with the same font as quite big towns. Or even more, the bigger ones are sometimes omitted on the map. This confuses a little and doesn't help in finding shops.
We also had a map 1:750000 of Scandinavia by Falk (polish reprint in cooperation with Pascal). Here the towns are marked better, but the roads are sometimes drawn incorrectly and smaller ones can be missing (as the scale is worse). We had also similar map of Baltic Countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania).
| Filename | Size | Date | Description |
| ceny.pdf | 90 kB | 28-08-2006 18:14 | Zestawienie wydatków |
Licznik: 449